Id%Version%Family%Infra family%Hybrid genus%Genus%Infra genus%Hybrid%Species%Infra species%Rank%Authors%Basionym author%Publishing author%Full name without family and authors%Publication%Collation%Publication year full%Name status%Remarks%Basionym%Replaced synonym%Nomenclatural synonym%Distribution%Citation type
630470-1%1.2%Orchidaceae%%N%Diuris%%N%punctata%%spec.%Sm.%%Sm.%Diuris punctata%Exot. Bot.%i. 13. t. 8.%%%%%%%%unknown
129408-3%1.1%Orchidaceae%%N%Diuris%%N%punctata%%spec.%Sm.%%Sm.%Diuris punctata%Exotic Botany%%1804 (1 Dec. 1804)%% Dockrill's selection of a neotype shown to be superfluous by Clements and Cribb, Kew Bull. 40 (1985) 655. It would also be superfluous under Art. 9 of the I.C.B.N. (1983) as Smith's illustration would serve as the holotype in the absence of a specimen.%%%%%unknown