Id%Version%Family%Infra family%Hybrid genus%Genus%Infra genus%Rank%Authors%Basionym author%Publishing author%Full name without family and authors%Publication%Collation%Publication year full%Name status%Remarks%Basionym%Replaced synonym%Nomenclatural synonym%Distribution%Citation type
77300054-1%1.2%Apiaceae%%N%Hydrocotyle%%var.%(G.Forst.) Spreng.%(G.Forst.)%Spreng.%Hydrocotyle hirsuta var. moschata%Syst. Veg., ed. 15 bis [Roemer & Schultes]%6: 347%1820%%the new combination 'H. hirsuta var. moschata' was incorrect when made; Sprengel treated H. moschata G.Forst. (1786) as a variety of H. hirsuta Sw. (1788).%Apiaceae Hydrocotyle moschata G.Forst.%%%%comb. et stat. nov.
843607-1%1.4%Apiaceae%%N%Hydrocotyle%%spec.%G.Forst.%%G.Forst.%Hydrocotyle moschata%Fl. Ins. Austr.%22%1786%%%%%%New Zealand (Australasia)%tax. nov.
843608-1%1.3%Apiaceae%%N%Hydrocotyle%%spec.%Thunb. ex Spreng.%%Thunb. ex Spreng.%Hydrocotyle moschata%Syst. Veg., ed. 15 bis [Roemer & Schultes]%6: 351%1820%nom. illeg. later homonym%On p. 347, Sprengel treated H. moschata G.Forst. as a variety of H. hirsuta Sw.; on pp. 351-352, Sprengel listed “H. moschata Thunb.” as an accepted name, ascribed the description to ‘Thunb. Diss. 2. ed. Pers. p. 412. (414)’ (= Thunb., Hydrocotyle 2, 4, 1798; in Persoon (ed.), Diss. Acad. 2: 414. 1800), and cited the locality as ‘Ad Promont. b. Spei.’ (Cape of Good Hope). However, Thunberg used previously published Hydrocotyle names (e.g., H. asiatica, H. moschata) without referencing the relevant authors%%%%Cape Province (South Africa)%tax. nov.