Id%Version%Family%Infra family%Hybrid genus%Genus%Infra genus%Rank%Authors%Basionym author%Publishing author%Full name without family and authors%Publication%Collation%Publication year full%Name status%Remarks%Basionym%Replaced synonym%Nomenclatural synonym%Distribution%Citation type
5905-1%1.3.2.2.1.1%Capparaceae%%N%Beautempsia%%gen.%Gaudich.%%Gaudich.%Beautempsia%Voy. Bonite, Bot.%3(Atlas): t. 56%1842%nom. inval.    Beautempsia, published as a monospecific genus, lacks a description.  Although t. 56 bears an analysis, the single species B. avicenniifolia has been presumed to be a new combination based on Capparis avicenniifolia Kunth 1824 (see Vienna Code Arts. 33.3 & 42.1(b))%%%%%%tax. nov.
60452344-2%1.2%Capparaceae%%N%Beautempsia%%gen.%(Benth. & Hook.f.) Gaudich.%(Benth. & Hook.f.)%Gaudich.%Beautempsia%Voy. Bonite, Bot.%4: 38%1866%%Reference to the basionym lacking; Vienna Code Art. 33.3 applies. As per the title page of vol. 4, Gaudichaud is the author of the Botany, and Charles D'Alleizette provided explications and descriptions for the plates (including an explication for Beautempsia avicenniaefolia pl. 56) published in vol. 3, 1842 (authored by Gaudichaud)). Type: B. avicenniifolia (Kunth) Gaudich. (Capparis avicenniifolia Kunth).%Capparaceae Capparis sect. Beautempsia Benth. & Hook.f.%%%%stat. nov.